BiodivPass
Transparency

How is the BiodivPass score calculated?

BiodivPass turns your 10 answers into three indices, then into a recommended proof level. Here is the method, no black box.

Three complementary axes

R

R — Regulatory exposure

Measures regulatory and contractual pressure on the project: profile, imposed requirement (local authority, investor, tender), how the result is used (CSRD, communication) and site sensitivity.

P

P — Site potential

Estimates the site's potential value: nature of the land, level of artificialisation, available open ground and the environmental sensitivity of the area.

T

T — Project maturity

Places the project in time: stage (feasibility to operation) and decisions already locked in. The further along the project, the more the window for action closes.

From scale to score

  1. 1Each answer contributes to one or more axes via a point scale (0 to 100).
  2. 2For each axis, the score is normalised to 100: points earned ÷ maximum possible points × 100.
  3. 3A combined score is obtained by weighting the three axes:
Score = ( R × 50% ) + ( P × 25% ) + ( T × 25% )

Regulatory risk weighs the most, as it drives how urgent proof is.

Four proof levels

The combined score determines the recommended level:

< 35 Contained exposure

At this stage, your regulatory exposure remains under control. An indicative BPS score is enough to document your approach and anticipate requests from your stakeholders.

35 – 51 File to build

Your operation combines moderate exposure with a site that carries stakes. An IRICE-signed BPS report lets you build a file that stands up to your financiers and authorities.

52 – 64 Proof to secure

High exposure and/or a closing decision window: producing solid proof becomes a priority. A full BPS — or an Effinature certification — secures your claims.

≥ 65 Immediate action

The combination of factors calls for action without delay. Bring in a qualified Biodiversity Partner this week to frame the project and contain the risks.

Scope and limits

The result is indicative and self-declared (based on 10 answers). It replaces neither a field ecological study nor an IRICE-signed BPS (Biodiversity Performance Score) — the only deliverable that stands up to your financiers, local authorities and auditors.

Ready to try?

Take the diagnostic